Sarah Solon

Editorial of the Week!

I know the tradition of DMIBlog is to salute Letters to the Editor, but highlighting this argument from the New York Times was just too good to pass up.

Ezekiel Edwards - on this blog and elsewhere - has pounded away at the Census' skewed practice of counting prisoners as residents of the districts where they are incarcerated, and not as residents of the districts they truly call home. In New York, this practice has created a few upstate congressional districts were there wouldn't otherwise be one.

The problem? A vast majority of prisoners come from urban districts downstate, and counting them as upstate residents diverts political clout and funding away from the urban social and economic issues that these communities need - not only to fight the social seeds that engender crime, but to bolster the neighborhoods that need this political and fiscal attention.

And it ain't just in New York. For urging the Census to count prisoners in a way that actually makes sense, this New York Times editorial earns a shout out.

Ending the Prison Windfall

Published: January 17, 2007

The Census Bureau typically uses the decennial census to test data-collection methods that become routine later on. The 2010 census should include a test run at counting the nation's 1.4 million prison inmates at their permanent addresses instead of in prisons. That would help bring an end to a corrosive but little known practice that distorts the political process in virtually every corner of the country.

Inmates are denied the right to vote in all but two states. But state lawmakers treat them as residents of the prisons when drawing legislative maps, to inflate the head count in lightly populated rural areas where prisons are typically built. This creates legislative districts where none would ordinarily be, shifting political influence from the heavily populated urban districts where inmates live.

Once inflated, these towns and counties siphon an outsized portion of state and federal aid. Politicians in districts with prisons sometimes brag openly about the windfall, as they mock "constituents" who are powerless to remove them from office and are packed onto buses and driven hundreds of miles to their real homes the minute they leave the prison walls.

The Census Bureau was made pointedly aware of this problem last fall. A report it commissioned noted that counting inmates at prisons distorted the political process and raised legitimate concerns about the fairness of the census itself. That report, by the National Research Council, recognized that the methods would not be simple to change, but urged the bureau to seeks ways to do it.

Collecting and verifying residential information for prison inmates is a complicated job. But the report suggested a perfectly reasonable interim solution. The bureau could publish detailed counts of the prison populations, so that the inmates could be subtracted at redistricting time. These figures would illuminate corrupt redistricting committees that use prison counts to pad districts that fall short of federal population requirements.

The Census Bureau has a crucial role to play in putting and end to this despicable practice. The 2010 census is as good a time as any to get started.

Sarah Solon: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 2:05 PM, Jan 19, 2007 in Letter To The Editor of the Week
Permalink | Email to Friend